Friday night traffic on I-5 is just horrendous! A one hour commute turns into a two hour commute with the traffic backups. i just came back from Seattle. My father-in-law was giving a presentation at a science teachers convention today. He requested that i make a video of the conference so he could analyze his seminar teaching style. While listening to his module on scientific inquiry, he made an interesting statement that has rattled around in my head all afternoon.
He said, "When we have a positive answer in an experiment we do not say that our hypothesis is true. We say that the experiment only corroborates the theory. Language like true and false is misleading in our quest for understanding. When the scientific community discovers a large enough body of supportive evidence we can infer the likelihood of a theories validity."
Hm… it sounds like he is talking about how language gets in the way of our understanding. Those of us who are seeking to live out our faith in a postmodern social context would do well to guard our language. Especially as we dialog with other Christians who do not share our views of authentic Christian commitment and experience. If we do not guard our language then we polarize into the binary opposites of US and THEM. The emerging church will become reactionary if we are not careful.
Let me explain what i mean by Authentic Christian Commitment. A Christian is a person who is fundamentally committed to being a Christ-Follower. Furthermore, every Christian throughout history has a notion of how her Christ-Following ought to be realized and lived. This notion forms a pattern of action and belief that is an expression of the individual's realization of their Christ-Following. This pattern becomes their view of authentic Christian commitment.
When we accuse others of being "inauthentic" what are we really saying? The evidence of your Christ-Following does not support my view of how one ought to follow Christ. They simply do not validate our theory of how to follow Christ as they do not follow Jesus as we do. Are they wrong? In error? Phony? Misguided? Or just plain different? i'd have to say that without a community it is impossible to tell. It is the tradition of our community that acts as a foundation and informs how we ought to realize our Christ-Following.
Therefore a Christian is also one who lives within a community with a tradition. It is within the tradition of our community that we find support, guidance, and nurture as we all journey thought this process of Christ-Following. But we do not have one homogeneous community to inform our Christ-Following. We have many differing communities to choose from. May I suggest that we in the emerging church dive into the dumpster of Christian history and rediscover the historic core of our forefathers.
Ours is not to be a tradition-less church, it is a church that is informed by Christian tradition and practice throughout the centuries. It is only by looking backward that we can chart the future for our communities and realize a pattern of Christ-Following that is appropriate for our emerging culture.
Recent Comments